Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwiat Jabłoni


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz Read! Talk! 23:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Kwiat Jabłoni

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Possible Promotional paid job on a musical band that fails to meet any criterion from WP:BAND, a before search doesn’t show me reliable sources that the band is notable, nor do they meet any criterion that suggests notability. Note that the article creator has been content forking and/ walking, they also created this non notable article; Katarzyna Sienkiewicz which is also nominated for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 21:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Delete. Definitely falls short of the guidelines in WP:BAND, and I agree that I suspect this is a paid promotion. Additionally the page is tagged as using deprecated sources, though I'm unable to tell which references they are. aismallard (talk) 21:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)

Keep, very popular band in Poland. Two LPs, three Platinums, PL Video Music Awards in 2018, constantly on radio Marcelus (talk) 07:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, DMySon (talk) 06:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: their first album reached no. 7 in Poland, the second one reached no. 1 . The platinum and double platinum certifications for the first and second albums, respectively, which are listed in the article also check out. The debut single has a triple platinum certification and the second one has been certified platinum as well . This may be paid editing, but they are definitely popular and notable in their home country. Richard3120 (talk) 13:48, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say popular, but borderline notable in the context of Wikipedia, yes. Weak keep from me per Marcelus and Richard. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:48, 16 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Strong keep: easily meets WP:BAND for Poland.
 * @1. Talked about in a number of independent sources, e.g. Wyborcza, Wirtualna Polska, and more.
 * @2. Lista_Przebojów_Programu_Trzeciego is one of, if not the most famous music chart in Poland.
 * @3. Sales certifications - the English OLiS article is mediocre, but the list is definitely legit and published by ZPAV (see also the Polish Wiki article ).
 * @5. Both albums released with Agora (company),  which should qualify as "an independent label with a history of more than a few years, and with a roster of performers, many of whom are independently notable".
 * ...etc. It satisfies a number of points in the WP:BAND list (note that the criterion is you really only need one). The suspicions about the author aren't particularly relevant to the nominator's notability claim + it's entirely plausible that the same independent editor might want to create both articles. ObsidianPotato (talk) 14:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.