Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwok Man Tai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 08:34, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Kwok Man Tai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't find independent references that denote notability per WP:CREATIVE or WP:GNG. Someone with an understanding of Cantonese may be able to find the necessary sources. Tchaliburton (talk) 03:24, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Looks like most of the awards are just some run of the mill student competitions. Sources are mostly primary sources of the competitions (press release of the results, say). zh:郭文棣, by the same editor (at least name match), is no better.  野狼院 ひさし  Hisashi Yarouin 03:57, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete As of now, he fails WikiProject_History_of_photography. However, I did visit his website, and those are some stunning photographs. He is obviously a talented and serious photographer. So I would say WP:TOOSOON. If and when he has a book published and has some some solo exhibitions, he will pass. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:42, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 00:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 00:39, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions.   -Fim atic   (talk &#124; contribs) 00:40, 9 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete and salt. This article has been deleted twice recently, and hasn't really changed much at all since then. But, the extra minor additions managed to make this article unsuitable for CSD or PROD, although would probably have the same outcome as this deletion nomination (given previous deletions of the page). The subject does not appear to meet WP:CREATIVE, and there is a distinct lack of secondary sources in the article. Thine Antique Pen (talk) 21:34, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.