Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwtham Kothoma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:00, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Kwtham Kothoma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Was screened at a minor film festival. Zero in-depth coverage from independent, reliable sources. Many of the current sources do not even mention the film. The only decent coverage is from the East Mojo, however, that site uses a "network of citizen-reporters", so probably doesn't qualify as a reliable source. Searches turned up zero in-depth coverage.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Onel 5969  TT me 14:17, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tripura-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 25 November 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 16:38, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The film is produced by Tribal Research and Cultural Institute and this qualify as a reliable source. Khorang  07:12, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It is purely a video linking to the movie, not WP:SIGCOV at all. Thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  10:17, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Already PROD'd, not eligible for Soft Deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 17:08, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️Let's Talk !  17:18, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment: There are sources here and here (brief mention). Not sure about reliability. DareshMohan (talk) 21:29, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
 * A routine announcement primarily quotes and a trivial mention are IMO insufficient to pass WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. Similarly, the current references are non-RS or SIGCOV-failing announcements and minor news stories, on regarding the screening in the minor festival. The article has a reception section but given no verification I'm uncertain how long it is, my BEFORE only mentions e.g., this so am at delete but do ping me if you find more refs. Thanks.  VickKiang  (talk)  20:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete the sources above are about all there is, I find nothing in Gscholar or Jstor, or Gbooks. No coverage. Oaktree b (talk) 22:12, 9 December 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.