Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyanna Lee


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 06:31, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Kyanna Lee

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability per WP:PORNBIO Tabercil (talk) 14:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 14:38, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Suitable for a comprehensive adult database, but not notable enough for Wikipedia. --Amwestover (talk|contrib) 14:48, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of passing WP:PORNBIO or WP:N. Tatarian (talk) 14:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Explanation – I hadn't read the pornographic actor criteria, but have now. I agree: (a) no major awards won or nominated for, (b) hasn't made a ground breaking contribution, and (c) hasn't featured much in mainstream media. When I added the profile, I thought that inclusion in the adult film databases and IMDB was enough, however according the these criteria it isn't. P3L3 (talk) 15:24, 13 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Three WP:PORNBIO nominations in a row? remember WP:NOTCENSORED--Ipatrol (talk) 15:29, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * And I repeat, I'm an active member of WikiProject Pornography, under who's ambit this page falls. Tabercil (talk) 15:59, 13 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, article fails to establish notability per WP:PORNBIO.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 00:43, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and I'd even say possibly a speedy delete as no real indication of notability. and please don't say that i don't have due respect to not censored, considering the things I've argued for keeping here. DGG (talk) 05:31, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete No independent reliable sources = not notable. Descíclope (talk) 23:55, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.