Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyaw Hein


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Hut 8.5 10:11, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Kyaw Hein

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Lack of notability. Only reference is a government site.  Enigma  message 17:14, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The site mentioned, while hosted on a government domain, is that of a newspaper, published by a company rather than a government department. No doubt the newspaper is close to the government, since Burma is a military dictatorship, but there is no reason to doubt the accuracy of this particular newspaper article. See http://www.mmtimes.com/no361/t001.htm for a later article from the same newspaper, hosted on its own domain. --Eastmain (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 23:04, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, unclear how he is notable. Stifle (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. This book says that he's one of the two most established actors in Burmese cinema. That sounds pretty notable to me, especially along with the Myanmar Times sources. Although that publication may not be the most reliable of sources for the political situation in Burma I see no reason to doubt its reliability as a source about actors. Phil Bridger (talk) 14:59, 30 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein (talk) 07:24, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep, notability established. WillOakland (talk) 08:13, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:BIAS. M0RD00R (talk) 14:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.