Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyber Crystal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page &#x260E;  ) 07:04, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Kyber Crystal
This is either fanfic or an outright hoax; certainly it's not something that actually appears in Star Wars. &mdash;Kirill Lok s hin 22:37, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. As a former Star Wars fan, the term is very vaguely familiar to me, though it's definitely not from the movies. There probably aren't any factual inaccuracies in the article; however, it's still overly detailed fancruft. Delete. -Rebelguys2 23:01, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Yes, the term is from Splinter of the Mind's Eye (properly spelled as "Kaiburr", I believe), but I'm pretty sure all the rest is garbage. &mdash;Kirill Lok s hin 23:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)


 * If this ain't StarWars-fancruft-bullshit, I dont know what is. -- Saberwyn - The Zoids  Expansion Project 23:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Okay, cheap fanfic copycat of the Kaiburr crystal (I thought it sounded familiar). Still delete-worthy for being fanfic bullshit. At the absolute most, redirect to correct spelling of name . Strong Delete all supershadow-cruft. -- Saberwyn
 * Redirect redirects are cheap, and don't take 5 days to do, and don't require an admin Segv11 (talk/contribs) 02:20, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete StarWarscruft, redirecting will merely encourage more -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 02:49, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable fan fiction. THe Kaiburr article needs a "too many pastel boxes" tag :).  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-13 12:22Z 
 * Delete. Not only is this straight from the infamous fanfic lier Supershadow, they cite his website on the bottom. IMO this is not a close enough spelling for a redirect. -LtNOWIS 20:26, 13 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.