Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyi-Leo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:43, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Kyi-Leo
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails GNG and bordering on PROMOTION. Another registered trademark (look at the first reference ) "breed" which is reality is a line of crossbreds marketed for the promotion of a business’s (puppy farm) product. I can find only one RS on Google with only a mention and scant information, the remaining Google hits are the usual "owners guides" and "complete owners manuals" from the same authors that pump out identical books retitled for every designer crossbreed imaginable. Cavalryman (talk) 21:56, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:05, 2 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete Notability not shown, list anything worth salvaging at List of dog crossbreeds but I wouldn't put a made-up trademark there! Reywas92Talk 22:23, 2 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails GNG, I concur with the book search, it should reside on the ever-growing list of cross-breeds that will eventually total the 30,000 combinations possible.  William Harris Canis lupis track.svg talk Canis lupis track.svg 09:00, 3 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TNT and WP:SIGCOV. This is the biggest nonsense I've seen in months. It's not just that the subject is not notable, it's not even wrong. It claims it's a this kind of bread, back-tracks, and then it says something else. The sourcing is laughable. Sorry not sorry. Bearian (talk) 20:06, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete - right in line with the above. Atsme Talk 📧 21:25, 8 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.