Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyiv Uprising (1018)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)

Kyiv Uprising (1018)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:CFORK covering topic already well described in Bolesław I's intervention in the Kievan succession crisis. Reading the latter it seems that such "uprising" isn't the most plausible end of the Bolesław I campaign, so nominated article can be also considered as possible WP:HOAX. Marcelus (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Marcelus (talk) 15:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Poland and Ukraine.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:17, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect or Delete. No interwikis, one broken reference claiming that there was something in the Internet Archive but with no link to follow. Redirect if a reliable source can be found that this term was even used for this incident, delete otherwise per nom's argument this is a CFORK/HOAX. My BEFORE (GB/GS search for this name in Polish and English) yielded nothing. PS. I see the author of this has created several similar articles. Battle of Radovychi is in mainspace. Most languish in draft: Draft:Battle of Monastyrysche (no sources), Draft:Battle of Yankivtsi (no sources), Draft:Struggle of King Danylo against the Golden Horde (one badly formatted source)... if the author reads this, they really need to study WP:V. PPS. And stuff like a heading "Polish War Crimes against the innocent Ukrainians in the Chełm and Podlasie Voivodoships (1942)" suggest WP:NPOV would make a good reading too. Sigh. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 03:14, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Insufficient evidence of notability in scholarly sources. - Altenmann >talk 15:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete I've seen hoaxes with better sources. Not worth a separate article. Hawkeye7   (discuss)  23:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.