Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle's Bed & Breakfast


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep as AFD started by banned user. Will (talk) 16:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Kyle's Bed & Breakfast
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable comic strip, not referenced at all CholgatalK! 01:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, per nomCholgatalK! 01:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Delete. Claims to be a syndicated comic strip and has at least one book out; however, it doesn't seem to be the subject of any sources, and is impossible to verify.  Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:21, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per addition sources. Notability is kind of thin, but it's decent enough now. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 21:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete Non-notable comic strip, we don't even know if this was something made up in school one day, or if it even exists! jon ( blab ) 01:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete:
 * Search on http://news.google.com/ for "Kyle's Bed & Breakfast" (in quotation marks) shows one source, but I doubt its reliability.
 * Search on http://scholar.google.com/ for "Kyle's Bed & Breakfast" (in quotation marks) shows no sources.
 * however, a regular Google search for "Kyle's Bed & Breakfast" (in quotation marks) reveals 3410 hits. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 02:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.   —Pixelface (talk) 02:48, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Well, it definitely exists, but finding reliable sourcing doesn't appear possible. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  17:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep: I've added three sources (including the New York Times) and am working on more. -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 17:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close - article is now adequately sourced. Nomination is by a confirmed sockpuppet, whose recent deletion spree was part of the abusive behavior that got him indefinitely blocked. Wikidemo (talk) 18:16, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close, has good sources and nominator is a sockpuppet. --Pixelface (talk) 23:17, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep lots of sources. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) 04:34, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and Speedy close per the notability sources found by Satyr and per rationale by Wikidemo, and per WP:HEY (Ten Pound Hammer changed !vote - Kudos to him). Time to repair the damage. — Becksguy (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep and Speedy close per above. &mdash; TAnthonyTalk 18:20, 2 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.