Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Chapman (US)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Clear consensus for deletion. North America1000 09:13, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Kyle Chapman (US)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nominating for deletion as non-notable. I'd say this subject falls within WP:ONEEVENT - he did receive some media/online coverage during the protests. Overall, however, he did not even play what I would call a "major" role in the protests, and it looks unlikely that he will receive sustained media coverage outside of his role in those protests. Slon02 (talk) 02:42, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:54, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:17, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete as notable only for one event. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. The article is in serious need of work, but as much as I would LOVE to sweep this guy under the rug, he has sufficient coverage in multiple reputable (and non-reputable) news sources and is now a "thing" to the Alt-Right. He was named to appear at a cancelled rally in California and is in the news for beating more people. LovelyLillith (talk) 17:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * A mention in connection with an event covered by an alt-weekly and a crime report in a local-news website is not my idea of extensive coverage. --Calton | Talk 14:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. If this were the "Berkeleypedia" there still wouldn't be enough for an article. --Calton | Talk 14:10, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  So Why  07:52, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete BLP1E, nothing notable enough to justify keeping this. Power~enwiki (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - BLP-1E. Carrite (talk) 15:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No context. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 15:14, 15 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete No substantial coverage from independent, reliable sources. Mduvekot (talk) 12:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Writing a single sentence with four measly sources does not a Wikipedia article make! He's also only notable for one event, which hardly qualifies his own page. At most, a section under the Berkeley protests would suffice. Not every "15 minutes of fame" person warrants a page.--Cinemaniac86Dane_Cook_Hater_Extraordinaire 13:14, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Textbook BLP1E. If he does something else later, then I guess technically it'd be a TOOSOON. South Nashua (talk) 18:33, 16 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.