Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle D. Logue


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. (non-admin closure) '''-- Cheers, Riley   Huntley ''' 00:19, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Kyle D. Logue

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

None of the provided sources (nor any of the others obvious in google) give an iota of in depth coverage in reliable sources as required by WP:GNG. He has twice been cited as an 'also ran' in US tax law citations, 1 and 2, but they appear not to have garnered him any in depth coverage. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:51, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep. I added more sources. Notable academic. Lawnaut (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I recommend you to read the WP:GNG against which we measure notability, in particular the bit about "receiv[ing] significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Stuartyeates (talk) 03:58, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Reread the article. It meets and exceeds not only the general notability guideline, but also the professor-specific guideline. Lawnaut (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Meets provision 5 of WP:PROF as "Wade H. and Dores M. McCree Collegiate Professor of Law at the University of Michigan Law School." I remind the nominator that this is explicitly an alternative to the GNG for academics.  DGG ( talk ) 04:21, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:58, 26 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per named chair at major law school, noted by DGG -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 00:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.