Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Dion (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:58, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Kyle Dion
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to meet WP:BASIC which calls for "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources". WP:MUSICBIO also calls for "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician". While these are secondary sources, they are stubby biographical pulp in music magazines. No significant musical contributions, no charted songs, and no awards. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:41, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:56, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete a non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Only one dedicated article from reliable source: Billboard. Vibe is not a reliable source. No results from any of the search tools at the top of this section. Not sufficiently notable. Tapered (talk) 08:29, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. CAPTAIN RAJU  (✉)   22:29, 1 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.