Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Katarn


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to Star Wars: Jedi Knight. Liz Read! Talk! 22:48, 30 November 2023 (UTC)

Kyle Katarn
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails SIGCOV and Notability, probably the sources mostly based on rankings/listicles only I think. Greenish Pickle!  (🔔) 21:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Shellwood (talk) 22:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep While the sourcing in this article IS indeed terrible, a cursory glance at Google News shows a large amount of discussion, albeit it can be hard to see the trees amongst the Valnet forest.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 09:07, 24 November 2023 (UTC) Merge A closer examination of the google sources shows that there's not actually that much said about him as a character, at least enough to really work for SIGCOV. If they utilize him in the films or current canon that may change, but for now it doesn't feel like it's there.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 04:48, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Star Wars: Jedi Knight. I am unconvinced that he is standalone notable - SIGCOV could not be found. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 20:17, 24 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Redirect or merge to Star Wars: Jedi Knight. Majority of article is in-universe content and reception is pretty threadbare. Beating a 40-year-old game character in a fan poll is hardly worth writing home about. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.