Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Laidig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 03:38, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Kyle Laidig

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Extremely detailed article w/photo about a 16-year old "influential freelance amateur photographer", created by a single-purpose account (see Special:Contributions/Fetuslord), sourced to a MySpace page. 19 GHits, all trivial. Fails WP:BIO. cab 05:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete -- why not a CSD A7? Iknowyourider (t c) 05:53, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Article asserts notability, even if some of the assertions are probably WP:BOLLOCKS cab 05:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Good call. Delete. Iknowyourider (t c) 06:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete clearly the vanity article of a non-notable individual. Article may assert notability, but it doesn't verify it in any reliable sources, trivial or otherwise. VanTucky  (talk) 06:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. Zero results in Google News Archive or Google Books. --Dhartung | Talk 07:12, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I'd speedy it for no credible assertion of notability, but let's let the AFD run its inevitable course. NawlinWiki 14:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete At best, WP:OR. Fails WP:BIO. Eliz81 15:15, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Absolutley classic case of somebody knocking up an entry about themselves in which they purport to be something great. No place on here whatsoever. Keresaspa 15:24, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per my notability tag; sorry I was too lazy to list it myself. I hope the editor will branch out, though, because he is a fairly good writer. Dekimasu よ! 00:01, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Userfy as it's probably WP:AUTO and should have been nominated for moving to the user's page. Bearian 22:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete (speedy delete?) per the comments above, fails WP:BIO and most other guidelines as well. (jarbarf) 03:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.