Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Muir


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  16:27, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Kyle Muir

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Longstanding unsourced vanity article (except a passing mention in the only source provided). The bulk of the content has been created by numerous users whose only contributions to Wikipedia have been to edit this article (inspect the contributions from the list of redlink usernames at the article's revision history). Of the news articles I've found related to this name, none have been about this individual. There have been a smattering of IMDB and social media mentions, but not much else on which to base an article. Appears to fail the notability standards. Mind matrix  14:18, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:21, 14 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article is not reliably sourced anywhere near well enough to get him over WP:GNG, and nothing stated in the body text is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to get over GNG. People are not automatically notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia just because it's possible to offer technical verification that they have a job — the notability test requires concrete and properly sourced evidence of his significance (e.g. Canadian Screen Award nominations or wins for his writing), not just listing his writing credits per se. Bearcat (talk) 17:06, 18 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.