Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Ostrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:29, 9 May 2019 (UTC)

Kyle Ostrow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject, I believe, fails WP:NHOCKEY. Only 12 games in the AHL which definitely fails #2 while ECHL Second All-Star team, I believe, is not enough to pass #3 and WCHA All-Academic team is not enough to pass #4. Almost all of the recent AfDs I've submitted have been pretty clear cut, this I'll be honest, is one I'm a bit unsure about and if I'm wrong, I'm wrong. Tay87 (talk) 21:48, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:03, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)


 * delete Some typical sports coverage fails the GNG and he also fails WP:NHOCKEY. Sandals1 (talk) 20:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete References are poor. WP:GNG is lacking.Benleg4000 (talk) 18:48, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:GNG and I can't see how he would qualify under WP:NHOCKEY.  PK  T (alk)  12:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NHOCKEY....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 14:42, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete If they had been a First team All-Star this would have been an argument to keep, however Second was a close as they got to notability and unfortunately that's just not enough for an article. As noted above WP:GNG would be very tough to pass for this player. Deadman137 (talk) 21:20, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.