Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle and Evan Do The Movies (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  02:48, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Kyle and Evan Do The Movies

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Previously nominated for lack of notability, and kept despite WP:SPAs/sockpuppets and absence of policy-based keep arguments. Still no real assertion of notability or cited source. No attempt has been made to clean up the article since the first AFD. Mosmof 08:20, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete No sources, no claims of notability. The previous AfD seems to make arguments of "it's interesting/useful" without really saying why it should be kept. --Strangerer (Talk | Contribs) 10:58, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:WEB or simple WP:N. Reading the first AFD, not sure why the result was a keep, when it was at best (and including the meat/sockpuppets) a no consensus. No external sources, no sign of improvement since the AFD. Ytny (talk) 16:09, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:V, NN. This is just a handful of blurry home videos uploaded by some guys over a period of several years to their own website, and must they be thankful that Youtube exists now.  Looking at the previous AfD, the assertion that closing admins look at the merits of the debate rather than counting votes is a touch shaky.  A directed Google search (minus Wikipedia and their own website) turns up zero hits.  To their credit, this was posted to their website's own log: "In case anybody cares, the Kyle and Evan Do The Movies article on Wikipedia is on its way to an eventual death. It's been flagged with 3 seperate "this is not a good article" notices. They also have a good point, it's not notable according to the notability guidelines."  RGTraynor 16:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment To be completely fair, looking at the original AfD again, most of the delete arguments weren't exactly convincing either. They were simple votes with no explanation. So I think keeping the article was the correct move, but not as a "keep", but as a "no consensus". Ytny (talk) 19:12, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - the number of Ghits is pretty damning. Non-notable and non-verifiable. -- Chairman S. Talk  Contribs  22:48, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.