Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylee Bertrand


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 11:04, 13 March 2023 (UTC)

Kylee Bertrand

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV, this source helps but one RS is not enough. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:49, 6 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, Canada,  and Caribbean. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 04:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 17:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep There are a good number of sources. There are decent sources like this, which are supported with other sources that are more routine in nature, but such sources are allowed to support and add. While I agree that there are way too many permastubs on wikipedia, I would say when there is a large quantity of sourcing regarding a player to write a decent article covering many different events, it adds up to being acceptable enough for an article. RedPatch (talk) 22:26, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. Not enough in-depth coverage. If sources are found please ping me. GiantSnowman 19:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep At a quick glance there does appear to be a sufficient number of sources (beyond the source in the nomination) in the article that discuss the accomplishments of the Dominica women's national football team player. --Enos733 (talk) 06:51, 2 March 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep - Per RedPatch and Enos733. Young player with ongoing career abroad and international capped career. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep I'd say the existing sources support notability, along with those mentioned in this discussion.Historyday01 (talk) 04:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG due to lack of significant coverage. The only source presented here or is in the article is this and it alone is not enough for the subject to pass GNG. I found no SIGCOV during a Google search and none on Newspapers.com. Alvaldi (talk) 19:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The one source mentioned above is essentially a press release (schools/proud parents send these out to local newspapers all the time) in local media, it's highly unlikely any of it is independent analysis by the author. JoelleJay (talk) 19:58, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:TOOSOON as there simply isn't any significant coverage available to show WP:GNG could be met. Jogurney (talk) 15:00, 10 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment: While there does appear to be some coverage by WP:RS demonstrating notability, the depth of that coverage might be interpreted in the context of WP:TOOSOON. Shawn Teller (talk) 21:10, 12 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Like many editors here I agree there's insufficient coverage here. Plenty of quantity. Nothing of quality. Everything applied is routine sports news as correctly assessed by User:JoelleJay. This is a BLP. We need direct detailing of the person, not merely the jersey number. BusterD (talk) 09:47, 13 March 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.