Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kylie Flinker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Lucy Robinson. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:48, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Kylie Flinker

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:ENT. although she has appeared in over 70 episodes of 1 series she has not had multiple notable roles. please do not invent notability criterion that 1 role is enough (which I've seen unsuccessfully pushed in other AfDs). she also has limited coverage in gnews so fails WP:BIO. LibStar (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC) Redirect Yeah LibStar is right in this case. It fails BIO. This was her only role. Certainly no need to have an article about the actress. Redirect into Lucy Robinson and briefly mentio n her as the original actress playing the role. Perfect example of where a biography is inappropriate. Dr. Blofeld       White cat 17:47, 18 May 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:59, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:23, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep It's just a stub, it's not self-promoting or selling anything. Its presence hurts nothing. Does it eventually turn into a real article about a significant individual? Maybe, maybe not. Carrite (talk) 15:29, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lucy Robinson. Flinker clearly does not meet WP:ENTERTAINER.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC).
 * Redirect to Lucy Robinson. Orderinchaos 04:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.