Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kynetx (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Kinetic Rule Language. ✗ plicit  11:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Kynetx
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP; non-notable former company with, as far as I can tell, no independent and significant coverage, though some passing coverage exists (1 2 3) The 2013 deletion discussion claimed to have found some coverage, but no specific details were provided, no such coverage was added to the article, and I haven't been able to identify such coverage myself. BilledMammal (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. BilledMammal (talk) 05:01, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kinetic Rule Language (KRL), their main product and what they were known for. From what I see coverage is mostly on KRL and less on the company.-- Mvqr (talk) 11:27, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 14:34, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Agree, six years after going defunct the company is not going to become notable. Effectively merge into Kinetic Rule Language since the language has a stronger case, especially if the few sources for the company are combined into it. W Nowicki (talk) 23:02, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Kinetic Rule Language (KRL) as above. Topic company fails NCORP criteria.  HighKing++ 17:51, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.