Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyocera Unimerco


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure)  TheSpecialUser TSU 08:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Kyocera Unimerco

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Appears to fail general notability guidelines. SarahStierch (talk) 04:51, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. 20:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)  • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Could you elaborate on this, please? Would citing additional/other sources help?Umjkb (talk) 11:50, 17 August 2012 (UTC) 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TheSpecialUser TSU 01:52, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Yes - more sources would establish notability. I would treat the history of Unimerco in the same article, as it appears to be the same enterprise, just with a slightly different name after acquisition - this is common practice for companies.Oranjblud (talk) 14:25, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep Company just about notable, in particular under previous name 'Unimerco' was worthy of new reporting in trade journals, sale of company was also notable. See archived news. eg reuters  -Actually quite notable. I've removed the redlinks that won't be notable. (won't fix though).Oranjblud (talk) 14:21, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 09:51, 30 August 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.