Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoko Kirigiri


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sam Walton (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Kyoko Kirigiri

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:GNG. Non-notable fictional character. Topic lacks significant coverage from reliable secondary sources. The article is just a plot dump. No sources. No information on the development or design of the character. No information on how the character has been received by critics or their real world significance. As there is no worthwhile content to merge, suggest deleting then redirecting to List of Danganronpa characters where the character is more appropriately covered. The1337gamer (talk) 09:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 09:03, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. The1337gamer (talk) 09:16, 25 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep Never heard of this franchise, let alone this character, before, but she appears to be covered as a statuette and as a cosplay opportunity. .  There's not a whole lot out there, but what I found with a trivial search there is far more opportunity to discuss this character in an encyclopedic way and the WP:GNG is met, so merging vs. standalone article should be an editorial decision. Jclemens (talk) 15:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The best you can do is a figurine announcement and photos of people dressed in costumes? Both of these don't even discuss the character. You haven't demonstrated the topic is notable or worth keeping at all. --The1337gamer (talk) 16:12, 25 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that's an awful attempt to meet the WP:GNG. That's not even close to something that constitutes significant coverage in third party sources. That's not even good anecdotal evidence. I know you don't like how these fictional character article are being merged/redirected/deleted, but come on, you've got to come up with something more convincing than that. Sergecross73   msg me  12:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not even close to meeting the WP:GNG. Entirely unsourced plot rehashing that only vaguely focuses on her. Nothing worth merging to the character article. I wouldn't object to a redirect, but I wouldn't particularly recommend it either. Sergecross73   msg me  12:53, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - A character article needs out of universe information in the form of reviews, and conception. Can anyone provide some reviews of the character? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:59, 26 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete unless some decent sources can be identified. If someone's keen on doing it, I've no great objection to a merge. Josh Milburn (talk) 01:18, 29 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.