Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoorius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sources found were not considered to be independent significant coverage. RL0919 (talk) 15:56, 5 November 2019 (UTC)

Kyoorius

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, balant advertising, lacks WP:RS, fails WP:GNG. Meeanaya (talk) 03:54, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:58, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Since possible sources have been brought forward in the last day, giving this another round so they can be properly considered.
 *  Delete  Obviously made up by someone with COI. And this article looks like promoting one organisation. Wiki is not place for it. — Harshil want to talk? 16:47, 21 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment I found this SIGCOV at Creative Review about the 2007 edition of its design awards (requires you create an account to read). -Lopifalko (talk) 06:17, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment. It appears that the major contributor didn't come here, and instead answered on their talkpage without following the instructions for replying. I'm unfamiliar with architecturaldigest but 'brandequity' is hosted on the indiatimes website, so might be closer to an WP:RS. I think given more time and more WP:RS this article could be ok. - ChrisWar666 (talk) 00:23, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 00:57, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete The criteria for notability requires that there are multiple references which provide significant coverage with in-depth information on the company. These references must contain independent content which is defined as follows: Independent content, in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. On analysis, most references fail as the content is not independent, relying on interviews/quotations from the CEO and company announcements or content created by connected sources. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 11:19, 5 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <b style="color:red">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.