Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyoto Energy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Kyoto Energy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. No independent sources. Beagel (talk) 14:29, 12 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Searched Lexis and Newsbank world; Found no coverage for Kyoto Energy, but Kyoto Box had a decent amount of coverage (although possibly falls afoul of single event coverage). However, it is important to note that none of the hits on Kyoto Box mentioned the Kyoto Energy corporation. So: Fails GNG and CORP as noted by nom. No merge to Kyoto Box is necessary as all content from this page is already on that article. AbstractIllusions (talk) 03:54, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:V. Even if it's all true, it's clearly not a major player in the huge energy field. Bearian (talk) 15:12, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR, as it is not AfD's role to do complete rewrites of articles where the article creator provided nothing verifiable.  Company website is returning 404 errors, so an internet rumor that they went bankrupt is credible.  This does not end this story for Wikipedia, as there may still be books written.  Unscintillating (talk) 23:38, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as quite honestly A7, barely any actual significance, let alone substance. SwisterTwister   talk  04:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.