Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyrgyzstan at the 2024 Summer Olympics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Kyrgyzstan at the 2024 Summer Olympics

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Draftify again. This is unreferenced, and was returned to mainspace unedited as the next edit post draftification. Simply WP:TOOSOON, apart from lack of references. 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Olympics and Kyrgyzstan. 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:18, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
 * DRAFTIFY for the reasons laid out above. I'd also recommend a speedy close . —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:18, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * I don't think 2 two votes are enough for snowball clause, especially at a venue as chaotic as AfD. Ca talk to me! 07:29, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Definitely not. It should run longer, even all the way to its end date. I see very little chaos, though. 👀 🇺🇦  Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 07:33, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, there is no minimum number of !votes that is required before invoking SNOW. I consider this a pretty clear-cut case, as there were very valid concerns for the first move to draftspace, none of which were addressed before the page was moved back. Especially due to the TOOSOON situation, I think this article really has a snowball's chance in hell of being kept, hence the call for a speedy close. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:19, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify obvs; per nom. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify - The added reference that is in English is not significant coverage. (I haven't machine-translated the other two.)  It is still too soon.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment to User:TechnoSquirrel69 - I do not recommend early closing AFDs as Delete if the originator is actively pushing the article, ever. The benefit of an early close is small.  The risk of early closing an AFD with an active originator is that they may request a Deletion Review.  (They always can request a Deletion Review, but we sometimes see a concern that an AFD was early closed.  You may save five days from the AFD, but then the DRV runs for another seven days.  The risk outweighs the benefit of an early close when the originator is pushing the article.  Robert McClenon (talk) 03:28, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @Robert McClenon: Good to know, thanks! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 03:31, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify per above. AryKun (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.