Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Altra Sicilia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 03:49, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

L'Altra Sicilia
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page describes a minor political grop which represents particular interests. Trash nomination in it.wiki seems to proceed successfull Invitamia (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2009 (UTC) 
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  --  I 'mperator 17:22, 12 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ( talk→   BWilkins   ←track ) 19:27, 18 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  20:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.  -- — LinguistAtLarge • Talk  20:58, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep, seems to be plenty of news coverage here. Unfortunately, I do not read Italian so I have no idea how relevant it is, but I'd prefer to err on the side of caution here.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 03:50, 25 April 2009 (UTC).
 * Keep From a quick look at the sources it's clear it's notable enough for significant coverage. The discussion at itWP ended in a keep. They go by counting votes there, and it was 16:9. The negative argument was it was not the encyclopedia's "core content", (they used the English phrase) but the majority concluded it doesn't have to be core content to be notable, saying, in my opinion correctly for us also, that coverage of small parties was an important thing to do: here's the debateDGG (talk) 22:53, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, even if it is far less relevant than Green Front and Decide! that are undergoing a similar deletion process and I would be astonished if this article will be "saved", while Green Front and Decide! are deleted. --Checco (talk) 08:51, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No representation --Invitamia (talk) 00:22, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per the above. — Nightstallion 23:50, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.