Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Chaim Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 16:42, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

L'Chaim Society

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:COATRACK This article appears to exist solely to write negative things about Rabbi Boteach. We lead with an out-of-context quote from Richard Dawkins about whether or not Boteach was associated formally with Oxford University, which seems to have nothing to do with anything, and then we launch into more negative stuff about the finances of the charity. No evidence given of independent notability. Propose merger with article on Rabbi Boteach. Jimbo Wales (talk) 13:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete- Attack page; while a NPOV article appears possible, this isn't it, and a future article should not be burdened with this in it's history. Dru of Id (talk) 01:00, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete An attack page against Shmuley Boteach who has been the victim of vindictive BLP violations. Our coverage of living people must be balanced, judicious and cautious. Cullen328 (talk) 05:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)
 * CSD G10:Attack page.--Müdigkeit (talk) 22:55, 20 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Note on G10: with all due respect to the calls for speedy deletion above, I have declined the request. I feel it does not meet WP:CSD, as some sources exist in the article. Also, not all of the material is negative. If any of the material in the article is blatantly negative and unsourced, please remove it before this AFD is closed.  Jujutacular  talk 01:16, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.