Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Herbe à brûler


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:46, 28 July 2018 (UTC)

L'Herbe à brûler

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Crappy bot article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK nor GNG. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  12:16, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete everything at present can be said on the arguably too insubstantial article on the writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. This is notable because it won the Prix Renaudot (WP:NBOOKS #2). I've expanded the article somewhat and I'd prefer to keep it separate for future editors to expand on the themes, plot detail, publication history etc. Merging it into Conrad Detrez would be unnecessary work and would make further expansion - which could start with the French article, or the larger French sources I included (Lefere, Jouanny) - more difficult. Mortee (talk) 19:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep, crappy afd of an article that meets WP:NBOOK having won a major award, nominator has obviously not bothered any WP:BEFORE to ascertain this. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:51, 24 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.