Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Ordine Nuovo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was My mistake, snow keep. The Last Angry Man (talk) 19:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

L'Ordine Nuovo

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The main source for this article seems to be from a book co-written by one of the founders of the paper. There are brief mentions on news articles but the Nuovo rates a brief mention only such as this on articles about Antonio Gramsci the founder. The Last Angry Man (talk) 18:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The main source for the article is Bellamy's introduction to Antonio Gramsci: pre-prison writings (Cambridge University Press, 1994). Bellamy was born in 1957, thirty years after the paper's founding, and was hardly a founder himself.  The newspaper is notable because of role it played in Italian politics during the rise of fascism and also for the notablity of its writers.  Google books shows thousands of hits.  Scholar shows almost 1,400.  There certainly are sufficient on-line sources to establish notability which is impressive for a newspaper that stopped publishing in 1921.  TFD (talk) 19:18, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I will withdraw the nomination if you explain why Gramsi is one of the authors credited on the main source? "Antonio Gramsci: pre-prison writings By Antonio Gramsci, Richard Paul Bellamy, Virginia Cox" or did I look at the wrong book? The Last Angry Man (talk) 19:27, 7 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep per TFD. This nomination is so groundless that it's really quite baffling. Writegeist (talk) 19:38, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This one doesn't make any sense to me. The sources are sound and notable and while it's not a subject that's exactly in the spotlight, it is encyclopedic. Trusilver  19:44, 7 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.