Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L'Strange


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite (talk) 00:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

L'Strange

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This album, along with Lovehammers' other three albums with articles, are all stubs and did not achieve any chart success, therefore making their articles unnecessary. JE98 (talk) 04:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Sheldybett (talk) 04:56, 25 February 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. I trust you realise that charting is not necessarily the sole indication of notability; WP:NALBUMS says charting is an indication a release may be notable, not that it is. I'm not saying this article has news coverage out there, because I haven't looked. But users need to stop acting like charting is the sole measure of whether a music release should have an article or not.  Ss   112   14:46, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
 * I do, I also mentioned how the articles are essentially unnecessary stubs whose information could be summed up on Lovehammers' article. Perhaps if they are expanded more I may change my stance. JE98 (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 23:50, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree that charting is not the only possible notability criterion - but it doesn't appear to meet any other. The article, as it stands, has only one source - the band's fanclub's archived website. I looked for better sources, but I can't find any significant coverage in independent media. Not notable; delete. Girth Summit  (blether)  20:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.