Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LÖVE


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 18:53, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

LÖVE

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article is based on primary sources, and I could not find anything to satisfy the general notability guidelines (WP:N). I had contacted the author (User talk:Thelinx) who provided additional sources, and , but I find these to be unreliable sources. Marasmusine (talk) 22:02, 26 March 2011 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MacMedtalk stalk 23:45, 2 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Lacks substantial coverage in independent reliable sources. Pburka (talk) 23:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete I do not consider the sources in the references section to meet WP:RS. Beyond that I could not find other sources on Google.  Beyond that I do not find that the article as written makes a claim which indicates notability.   Blue Rasberry    (talk)   12:45, 4 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources independent of the subject. None of teh sourcing in the article demonstrates notability, and is primarily sourced to the their own site and forums.  The additional sourcing provided and noted in the nomination is also problematic as noted by the nominator.  I found this listing in a game engine design book, but it's just an entry in the appendix and actually doesn't say anything about the framework. -- Whpq (talk) 16:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.