Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lázně Bludov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. SarahStierch (talk) 19:25, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Lázně Bludov

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Appears to be promotional and lacks notability as per WP:SIGCOV. Sole source is the official website. Article also makes factually dubious and unsupported claims. Admin declined A-7 speedy deletion on grounds subject might have some minimal significance. Ad Orientem (talk) 06:04, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment I have added a reference from the Czech Tourist Authority on the factual side of the article (the spa's foundation). Google Books searches turn up several publication references, though not in full view. I take your point about the actually dubious claims, though these are common with spas, and can be covered by normal editing? The snippet from the "Czechoslovakia Today" book (1964) does indicate that children with cardiac conditions were/are sent there. AllyD (talk) 06:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Weak keep or merge into Bludov (Šumperk District) which already has very basic coverage of the spa. AllyD (talk) 06:43, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  07:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions.  czar   &middot;   &middot;  07:32, 3 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep the spa is mentioned in the Czech Encyclopedia of Spas and Springs and in other books. The article is expandable, the information is verifiable. We can also redirect and merge the information to Bludov (Šumperk District), but I can't see any benefits for Wikipedia in deletion of this article. --Vejvančický (talk / contribs) 07:57, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep Style of the article is not like advertising, but pure factual.--Yopie (talk) 09:33, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per the source User:Vejvančický found. I would probably have said keep even without it, because this is  not at all a  promotional article. The use of these spas for medicinal purposes is not fringe, but a routine mainstream long standing medical practice in some countries.  DGG ( talk ) 15:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep per above. Meets GNG with secondary coverage. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:16, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.