Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Légende Entreprises


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  10:07, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

Légende Entreprises

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was created by a well known sockpuppeteer, Alma Fordy. It was created by this user who was blocked indefinitely for sockpuppetry. There are not enough sources for this article. It also fails WP:GNG. Evil Idiot (talk) 15:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2018 May 22.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 15:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Sources seem to exist, although mostly in French. Here are a couple of articles about partnerships with other companies to produce various works, in the early 2000s: Screen Daily, AlloCiné. I'm willing to presume there are also sources discussing the production of 1492 and Casino, although those are just early enough to make online source availability spotty. Alain Goldman is likely not notable outside of his company, and searches for him suggest other material may be available. In any case, as with La Petite Reine's AFD, this is not block evasion, as it was created prior to Alma Fordy's first block for sockpuppetry. Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 14:42, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete As per Ossifrage above, while sources may very likely exist, the problem is that sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability ... don't appear to exist. For example, the screendaily reference relies extensively on Benoit Jaubert, the company's general manager and therefore fails WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. The allocine reference is derived from a company announcement and relies on quotations from the company officers or related people, therefore not intellectually independent and likewise fails WP:ORGIND. A search does not reveal anything better. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep the screendaily reference is only partly an interview but more is needed Atlantic306 (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:16, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The article's subject is the production company (partially) behind Martin Scorsese's Casino and Ridley Scott's 1492: Conquest of Paradise. It is prominently featured in trade articles, e.g. here, and here. Check the gate, we move on. -The Gnome (talk) 20:31, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.