Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lục Xuân Hưng


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:09, 22 September 2014 (UTC)

Lục Xuân Hưng

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Yet another soccer player who is not notable and has barely even played that many games, maybe someday, but not today! Wgolf (talk) 21:22, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:48, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - He has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:50, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - He hasn't played in a Fully professional league and he doesn't have any international caps either therefore he fails WP:NFOOTBALL. IJA (talk) 09:02, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 12:36, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NSOCCER, having never played in a fully professional league, and contains no references. Should have just left the BLPPROD tag on the article.  G S Palmer (talk • contribs) 23:48, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks WP:RS BlueSalix (talk) 05:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.