Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L-Charge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  13:18, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

L-Charge

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

WP:SERIESA. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  02:18, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 23:45, 23 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment no reason has been given for deletion at all. TechCrunch is not used in the references. So user:Ari T. Benchaim what is the real reason to delete? Could Ksenia34, the creator be an undisclosed paid editor? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:24, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I have amended the original nom. I forgot where TECHCRUNCH redirected. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 12:34, 27 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as WP:TOOSOON. This is all press releases and puffery so far. Stuartyeates (talk) 10:13, 30 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Weak delete. The company is on the verge of being notable, but this article is a WP:PROMO and everything I can find about this company is trade press, routine coverage, or dependent sources like profiles.  Maybe in a few years.  FalconK (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.