Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L.K. Elliot


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

L.K. Elliot

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet WP:GNG. Coverage is self-published or weak. Subject's book is self-published and does not appear to be notable. Tone is non-encyclopedic and promotional. ubiquity (talk) 14:07, 5 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Spammy, no credible claim of significance (borderline WP:CSD). Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 17:41, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 13:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor Talk! 13:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly non-notable, and the links on the page aren't reliable. FuriouslySerene (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable. Kierzek (talk) 15:38, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Clearly too soon. SwisterTwister   talk  08:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.