Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Ashley Aull


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Ian Manka Talk to me! 23:20, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

L. Ashley Aull
vanity/non-notable student, speedy delete was contested, thus relisted here Travelbird 17:04, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I'd agree that the speedy should've been contested, though perhaps a prod would have been appropriate. GeeJo (t)⁄(c) &bull; 17:23, 27 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete as subject falls well short of WP:BIO criteria. Not a speedy candidate though as there is some attempt to establish notability.  On a side note, was that speedy contested or just removed without comment?--Isotope23 18:32, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no such thing as a contested speedy. You may replace speedy tags and issue appropriate warnings.  Anyways, whether or not there is a vague claim of notability, still not notable.  Wickethewok 19:26, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 22:21, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.