Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. Joseph Bajek


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. joe deckertalk to me 14:46, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

L. Joseph Bajek

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Résumé like article. Gnews = no info. Ghits = no third-party sites for this specific person jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 03:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

This page has been updated with links and references since it was nominated for deletion. I think it now meets the criteria for publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Billuconn11 (talk • contribs) 04:12, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. The article still lacks secondary sources. The three sources currently cited are the subject's LinkedIn profile, a state society he is president of, and the national society. There's no evidence of coverage by, say, magazines or newspapers. Even with sources, I'm not convinced that being president of the Colorado Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society meets WP:BIO. —C.Fred (talk) 04:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 08:44, 11 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete No indication of wp:notability. It's just brief bio type information, so not much would be lost. North8000 (talk) 16:50, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is all too promotional, and the references don't bear out that this person is a "community leader" we at Wikipedia should take notice of. Possibly related are two other AfDs: Articles for deletion/Thomas Mercaldo and Articles for deletion/Aquinas Consulting. Drmies (talk) 03:29, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - I didn't see anything on a Yahoo! search. SwisterTwister  talk  02:19, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.