Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/L. R. Kershaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep and tag as unreferenced PeaceNT 14:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

L. R. Kershaw

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged as WP:CSD but notability is asserted. Not sure if it's credible. Guy (Help!) 22:49, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unverified and unsourced --RaiderAspect 04:14, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 * comment If some of this could be documented, he would clearly be notable. Let's see what people here can find.DGG 07:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)DGG 07:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,


 * Keep Notable individual who had a significant influence in the development of Oklahoma. Inkpaduta 04:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, notable yet lacking sources make this article a perfect candidate for a second nomination Alf photoman 14:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Local interest only, not notable enough per WP:BIOSlideAndSlip 22:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep While not instantly recognizable, he appears to be of note, although lacking any page formatting or citations. --Ozgod 01:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep several claims to near notability are enough to make a man notable, IMO. Needs wikification though.  Eluchil404 08:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:BIO. John Vandenberg 07:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.