Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LACline


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:51, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

LACline

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No independent sources show notability. The only sources are press releases. Brainy J ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 18:56, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Brainy J  ~ ✿ ~ ( talk ) 18:57, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 19:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Comment A clear case of WP:COI here. The article author previously said "This username and contributions represent the artist and work of L.A. Cline, the old username was associated with her website. This new username is associated with herself and her work as a contributing Portrait Artist." Note also the unblock agreement on User talk:Lacfineart "not use any content for advertising and promotion purposes". AllyD (talk) 20:01, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Searches on Highbeam and Questia turned up nothing; Google only shows press releases and user-submitted content. Fails WP:BASIC, fails WP:ARTIST. AllyD (talk) 20:08, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:57, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - I don't think this should be deleted because it has a COI, but down to the lack of sufficient references 193.109.199.71 (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreliable sources and no proof of notability. Clearly WP:AUTOBIOGRAPHY. --Drm310 (talk) 15:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.