Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LDN Noise


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that the article does not meet the notability guidelines Davewild (talk) 06:41, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

LDN Noise

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I came across this as a speedy deletion via WP:A7, but the association with notable performers is enough to where they'd squeak by speedy standards. However a search doesn't really bring up anything that would really assert notability for this production duo and I also need to note that while the article asserts that they are "Grammy-nominated", this statement refers to a Grammy nomination for Chris Brown- which is not the same as LDN Noise actually receiving a nomination themselves. They have worked with international artists so there's potential that there could be sources in another language, but offhand I'm really not seeing any true notability here enough to where they'd pass notability guidelines, especially as notability is WP:NOTINHERITED by them working with notable persons. It can make it more likely, but it's not a guarantee. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  09:36, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I just couldn't find anything but mentions. Seems like they also work with K-pop musicians but again I only saw mentions in Korean articles. Maybe just WP:TOOSOON —Мандичка YO 😜 09:57, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Notable The grammy nomination is indeed for the album "Fortune" which included "turn up the music" a song written by both members of ldn noise. all reference's are there to be seen and from notable sources such as mtv, allkpop, grammyawards etc. i think theres more than enough evidence that the duo work with many artists. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natalielouise87 (talk • contribs) 16:37, 19 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Notable the references seem genuine, a quick scan of their social media sites show them to be working with a lot of music artists in different countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregagentx (talk • contribs) 17:01, 19 May 2015
 * Comment: Just a quick note- please be aware that AfDs are not decided on a vote and if you were asked to come vote on this AfD, you need to look over Wikipedia's policy on canvassing. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  03:44, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:03, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Esquivalience t 01:37, 26 May 2015 (UTC) Comment I think you should think of nominating Agent X created by Gregagentx above as well as it suffers from similar problems where notability is asserted by association with notable people. Cowlibob (talk) 07:15, 26 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'll try to take a look at it later on tonight. I took a small vacation this weekend so I need to catch up on some stuff first. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon  02:39, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Despite their success, there is no in-depth coverage of this team in reliable sources; the most I can find is very brief mentions either in lists of "X has worked with Y, Z, and LDN Noise..." or in credits for specific records "the single, which was produced by LDN Noise, is released on..."; so I can't see how a detailed Wikipedia article can be created. Colapeninsula (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.