Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LEDA 2791735


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2022 (UTC)

LEDA 2791735

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NASTRO. It exists (Simbad) but good luck finding any coverage. Lithopsian (talk) 13:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Lithopsian (talk) 13:44, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Per nom. If every referenced body used to locate a star is redlinked, does anyone hear the supernova? Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. The text of the article makes a pretty convincing case that the object is not actually notable. Aldebarium (talk) 19:14, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: even NED has very little on this object. Non-notable. I would also consider removing it from Carina (constellation). Praemonitus (talk) 00:48, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete The article almost admits that the object is not notable.PopePompus (talk) 22:36, 12 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.