Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LED circuit (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. Considering the few contributions of the nominator, suggests questionable policy knowledge and also maybe AGF nomination, but that does not lessen the fact the the article is well within guidelines, i.e it being covered by reliable sources; consensus also being apparent at the last AFD. (Non-administrator close) Rt . 15:47, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

LED_circuit
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

article restored after DRV attended by none. The concerns raised in the original AfD have not been addressed. A blitter (talk) 04:25, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Close this nomination. This renomination is premature.  The last AFD was only a few weeks ago (and ended in a conditional "keep").  The decision was reviewed in a Deletion Review discussion which endorsed the closure.  Contrary to the nominator's claim, the deletion review discussion was well attended.  I see no new evidence in this nomination that would substantially change the prior decisions.  (That said, it would be nice if more people joined the merger-proposal discussion on the article's Talk page.)  Rossami (talk) 13:38, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:54, 21 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.