Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LGBTTTIQQA*

LGBTTTIQQA* was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. 10 votes to delete, 1 of which would have accepted redirect. Postdlf 06:13, 25 Oct 2004 (UTC)

LGBTTTIQQA*
I'm all for parody but this is just lame. Non-notable. -- Graham &#9786; | Talk 22:42, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Jmabel | Talk 23:35, Oct 18, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Shane King 00:31, Oct 19, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- DavidWBrooks 13:24, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete: and its asterisk, too. Neologism/joke/parody.  Geogre 19:26, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No Discernible legit reason for existence. at best a asterisk (subclass) to LGBT FatherStorm 19:31, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not in actual use. Joke or at best neologism. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 23:02, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. -- Hyacinth 16:55, 22 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I have seen this before: from the kind of people who are trying to assert that LGBT is already too long and unwieldy when the word gay would suffice just nicely to cover everybody and why do we have to be all separate and stuff and why can't we all just be friends yadda yadda blah blah...the LGBT article even makes brief reference to this (albeit without the * ). So I'm with the delete. Bearcat 06:32, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Redir to LGBT or delete. D AVODD  [[User_talk:Davodd|« TALK »]] 09:39, Oct 23, 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.