Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG Shine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 21:49, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

LG Shine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

What makes a phone model notable? Major awards (not shown here, only some minor ones). Reviews from major publications (not shown here, of course, some low quality reviews on a blog or two can be found). Overall, not seeing any coverage to satisfy WP:GNG, all there is are press-releases and low quality blog/SM reviews and like. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 05:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  05:51, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak keep - I'm going to admit that I'm a geek and collect stuff like this first of all. There aren't many LG handsets that are notable, the Shine is certainly on the upper end of notability for that manufacturer. Amongst the news coverage I see Engadget, Gizmodo, Wired and CNET. From what I can recall there was quite a fuss about the device at the time, however article rot seems to have removed any mainstream news stories that I can recall. I would suggest that if LG handsets are mentioned at all, this is one of the more notable ones. Shritwod (talk) 19:30, 29 November 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 03:23, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Specific historic phone models can be notable.  LG is major manufacturer of such.  This is a decent article, with photos and development.  J947 provides assertion this is one of the more notable LG ones. --Doncram (talk) 05:20, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Not me, I just relisted it. Shritwod is who you are referring to.  J 947 &thinsp;(c) , at 00:51, 7 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.