Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LG U8360


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Redirect There isn't any properly verified information to merge into another article. We can leave this as a redirect. Spartaz Humbug! 20:14, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

LG U8360

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable cellular phone. Wikipedia is not a cell phone directory. Wikipedia is not a Lucky Goldstar catalog. There are too few substantial, independent references to support a meaningful Wikpiedia article. As a result, we're left with this -- which reads like an advertisement. Mikeblas (talk) 16:48, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge Products can generally be merged with the company articles. -- neon white user page talk 18:09, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect - lacks media coverage Addhoc (talk) 23:58, 22 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipdeia ia not a celphone catalog. This article lacks any references with substantial coverage in reliable and independent sources, so it fails to show the phone is notable. Edison (talk) 01:56, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Merge. There are a lot more articles on cell phones than I realized (see here). I'd like to see this and all of the other phones merged into articles based on company. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  [ t &#183; c ] 04:39, 27 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I just think it's a good thing to have articles on cellphones. Greswik (talk) 17:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please read WP:ILIKEIT. -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:18, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Reply to coment: I have certainly read this. My point is not that I like cellphones more than the next man, but I think this is an encyclopedia, and, then, it should have articles about various subjects people might want to look up. To me, this includes cellphones. I don't think the article you are pointing to here is to the point for my reason. Greswik (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom or at least redirect to LG Telecom. Wikipedia is not a directory is the link about the policy. The article itself is really lack of verifiable reliable sources to become an independent article. Dekisugi (talk) 10:47, 29 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: WikiProject Telecommunications has been informed of this ongoing discussion. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 23:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep : I don't think deleting this article is nom. And if the article is to be deleted, almost half of article related mobile phones should be deleted as well. Wikipedia is also not a repository for non-notable Motorola products.--Appletrees (talk) 11:03, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Please read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Plenty of Sony/Ericsson and Motorola phone articles have been deleted, anyway. What is "nom"? -- Mikeblas (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Still, your rationale sounds not enough reason to delete the article. I checked almost all existing mobile phone articles and half of them I've never heard of are stub articles without proper sources but you just nominate LG products. If you want to keep articles about very popular and famous products in wiki, you should've proposed those articles too. What do you think is nom in your perspective? You're the nominee, so please tell me first. --Appletrees (talk)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.