Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LISA+


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 23:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

LISA+

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Proposing as a non-notable product, this is little more than a thinly-veiled advert for the product, WP is 2nd hit, company website #3 and that's all folks. Wasn't sure if it would get CSD'd under G11, feel free to SNOW delete.  Captain Screebo Parley! 14:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:17, 10 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete - if it's not G11, it's pretty bloody close. Stalwart 111  03:00, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. The advertising tone is actually not as bad as usual.  This is a traffic engineering software for the planning and management of signalized intersections.  In English, this means "software that controls traffic lights," and the article's text is the kind of writing that makes me want to reach through the screen, grab somebody by the collar, and shake them.  So why isn't the article written in proper English?  Because describing the product as one of several programs that run traffic lights makes it pretty obvious that no individual product in that category is ever going to have the kind of lasting significance it would need to be a encyclopedia subject.  In this category, I reckon that only the products that malfunction so spectacularly that they get blamed by reliable sources for multiple fatality wrecks have a shot at ever being encyclopedia subjects.  Be glad that yours is not one of those. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:44, 11 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - software article lacking 3rd party references to establish notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. -- Whpq (talk) 14:23, 15 April 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.