Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LM314V21 Victory 2 Gundam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Mobile Suit Victory Gundam. Whether another redirect target and/or a merge would be good ideas is, as always, at editorial discretion. Seraphimblade Talk to me

LM314V21 Victory 2 Gundam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This fictional weapon does not establish notability independent of its series through the inclusion of real world information from reliable, third party sources. Most of the information is made up of original research and unnecessary plot details. There is no current assertion for future improvement. TTN (talk) 18:09, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge to Mobile Suit V Gundam. Also, anyone but TTN enlighten me about whether appearing in a game with no relationship with the original universe serves as notability.  This one does appeared in a game that is outside of the Gundam universe as 1 of the 4 main characters.(Yes, a character, not a mecha, he(it?)pilots a bigger mecha and has a personality in that game)  I might change to a keep if it does.  MythSearchertalk 18:12, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Merge as per Mythsearcher. Edward321 (talk) 23:41, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Mergeto List of Gundams of the UC timeline or List of gundams in Gundam V 70.55.200.131 (talk) 06:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * List of Gundam Universal Century mobile units is already quite large, as the UC timeline is quite large. May I suggest a better merge target, such as List of (series) mobile units (where "(series)" is the name of the series, as this is copypasta as your !vote)? 208.245.87.2 (talk) 15:56, 22 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Yet another non notable fictional weapon. -- nips (talk) 19:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
 * care to explain why? You can say "not notable" and I could reply "notable", and no matter how much of it there was, it wouldn't amount to an argument either way. And care to explain why it is not suitable for a merge? or a redirect? Remember, you said delete. DGG (talk) 04:13, 23 October 2008 (UTC)
 * This fictional weapon has very few Google search, it's not referenced by any magazine, as far as i know and additionally, its notability, if any, depends on the anime series. Additionaly, article has so many speculations like "The most important upgrade was the Minovsky drive system" that probably it's just an original research. -- nips (talk) 18:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I don't know if you have read the article or not, but it says that the mecha also appeared in a game that is totally unrelated to the anime seires, and this particular mecha became a main character of it as well. So its notability may also come from that.  It is a pretty old game and the article for that is only a stub, but I am pretty sure that the notability, if any, is not purely from the anime. MythSearchertalk 01:54, 25 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.