Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOKRUMENTAL


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:52, 20 August 2022 (UTC)

LOKRUMENTAL

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not a clear A7, already draftified before. Lack of reliable, independent and significant sources. Fails NMUSIC. ~Styyx Talk ? 01:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and Poland.  ~Styyx Talk ? 01:01, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Am I the only one who is unimpressed by the recent crop of musicians WHO YELL THEIR NAMES as if that makes them more important? This band has gotten some airplay here and there, but sources briefly mentioning such airplay is all they have, and that does not qualify for the significant and reliable coverage that is required here. Otherwise they're only visible in the usual streaming and social media directories. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (TALK&#124;CONTRIBS) 13:40, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete only sources are streaming services and youtube, no news found, nothing of note. Oaktree b (talk) 20:13, 13 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:GNG is not met. No pl wiki interwiki is a red flag too (and pl wiki is very inclusive when it comes to musical topics, so if the topic isn't good enough for pl wiki, it certainly isn't ready for en wiki). --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.