Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LOWERN


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. RL0919 (talk) 11:47, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

LOWERN

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Subject lacks significant coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. Meatsgains (talk) 20:42, 3 May 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:53, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. This looks like a classic case of WP:NEOLOGISM in my searching, and there's a pretty decent bar for scientific jargon acronyms getting an article. KoA (talk) 22:14, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star   Mississippi  01:22, 18 May 2022 (UTC)
 * climate interestingly makes no mention of climatic factors, and this is clearly an omission in Wikipedia. However most sources do not agree on this list, some sources do not even agree on the number or divisions amongst factors, and no sources that I found agreed to the extent of six factors with these particular spellings in this order yielding this initialism at hand.  It's not a widespread or accepted terminology, and didn't turn up in any of the books on physical geography, from the 19th to the 21st century, that I just read to find out what they gave as climatic factors.  Yes, this highlights a basic omission in our climate article.  But it does not actually fix it, and it isn't something that is generally agreed-upon in its own right. Uncle G (talk) 16:57, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep -- high pageviews, and importance in curriculum in Canada seems to be highly relevant for educational users of the encyclopedia. It should be treated more like a disambiguation page, rather than a content page, Sadads (talk) 20:56, 22 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.